If your sales team is quoting complex deals manually—or juggling five tools just to get pricing approved—CPQ software isn’t a nice-to-have. It’s essential. But finding the right CPQ solution is harder than it looks.
Every vendor promises automation, accuracy, and speed. But not every tool fits your product model, sales process, or tech stack. And in CPQ, the wrong fit doesn’t just slow you down—it can derail deals, frustrate reps, and bury you in technical debt.
This guide cuts through the noise. We’ll show you what really matters when evaluating CPQ software, how to compare vendors without the buzzwords, and what red flags to watch for before you sign the contract.
The Challenge with Choosing a CPQ Tool
The CPQ market isn’t short on options—but it is short on clarity.
On paper, most CPQ platforms sound the same: automate your quotes, reduce errors, accelerate sales. But behind the buzzwords, there are real differences in what they’re built for—and who they’re built to serve.
Some are CRM-native plug-ins designed for simple quote generation. Others are enterprise-grade systems with complex pricing engines, contract workflows, and integrations galore. Then there are mid-market tools that sit somewhere in between—flexible, but not overengineered.
And that’s where the real challenge lies: you’re not just buying software—you’re embedding a new sales logic into your business.
CPQ is not one-size-fits-all
Here’s how quickly things can go wrong:
- A growing B2B manufacturer chooses a tool meant for SaaS quoting—only to find it can’t handle product bundles, regional BOMs, or accessory rules.
- A sales team selects a lightweight CPQ tool for speed—then outgrows it within 6 months as discounts and approvals get more complex.
- An enterprise IT team pushes for deep customization—resulting in a CPQ that takes 9 months to implement and becomes impossible to maintain without devs.
In each case, the issue isn’t that the tool is bad. It’s that it wasn’t the right fit for the quoting complexity, team size, or integration needs.
Complexity kills momentum—unless you plan for it
Most CPQ projects fail because buyers underestimate how tightly quoting is connected to the rest of the business:
- Pricing logic comes from ERP
- Approvals flow through finance and legal
- Sales wants autonomy, but ops wants control
CPQ has to sit between all these worlds—and if your tool can’t flex between them, it becomes another bottleneck instead of a multiplier.
That’s why evaluation isn’t just about features. It’s about alignment—with your data, workflows, tech stack, and users.
Core Evaluation Criteria (Extended)
In addition to configuration, pricing, integrations, and workflow logic, here are more advanced checkpoints that separate scalable CPQ platforms from short-term solutions:
Governance & Version Control
- Can admins control who can edit, approve, or override quotes?
- Is every quote version tracked with timestamps, comments, and edit logs?
- Can teams roll back or duplicate past quotes easily?
This becomes critical at scale, especially in industries with regulatory or audit requirements.
Mobile & Remote Accessibility
- Can sales reps build, send, and track quotes on mobile or tablet?
- Is there offline capability for field reps?
- Does the platform offer native apps or responsive interfaces?
Essential for distributed teams, global reps, and real-world selling—not just desktop workflows.
Multi-Currency & Localization Support
- Does it support multiple currencies, languages, tax rules, and regional pricing?
- Can it adapt documents for global subsidiaries or channel partners?
If you’re expanding internationally or managing multiple business units, this is non-negotiable.
11. Deal Intelligence & Analytics
- Does it provide quote performance metrics—win rates, time-to-close, discount impact?
- Can you track how pricing, product mix, or rep behavior affects deal velocity?
- Does it integrate with BI tools (like Power BI, Tableau) for deeper visibility?
You’re not just quoting—you’re learning. Data turns CPQ into a strategic asset.
Channel & Partner Enablement
- Can external reps or partners use a simplified version of your CPQ?
- Can you control access to SKUs, pricing, and rules by user type or partner tier?
If you sell through resellers or distributors, CPQ should support them without exposing your full backend.
Support & Ecosystem
- Is support included or paywalled?
- Is there a user community, knowledge base, or sandbox environment?
- Are certified implementation partners available for your region/stack?
Great tech falls flat without good support. Know what’s behind the software.
14. Roadmap & Vendor Stability
- Is the platform evolving with your industry?
- Are they investing in AI, automation, UX improvements—or just maintaining status quo?
- Do they serve businesses your size—or will you be a small fish?
Pro Tip: Ask about the last 3 major product updates. If the roadmap is vague, the vendor may be stagnating.
Vendor Fit Based on Business Size and Sales Model
The best CPQ tool for your business isn’t always the one with the most features—it’s the one that fits your quoting reality, tech stack, and team maturity.
Here’s how to assess vendor fit based on your business profile:
Small to Mid-Sized B2B (1–20 sales reps)
- Priorities: Ease of use, quick deployment, minimal IT dependency
- Look for: CRM-native tools or CPQs with intuitive UI and templates
- Avoid: Overly complex enterprise-grade solutions that require dev-heavy setup
Good fit: DealHub, PandaDoc, HubSpot CPQ
Mid-Market B2B (20–100 reps)
- Priorities: Configurable logic, approval workflows, ERP integration
- Look for: Tools that balance flexibility with usability—modular platforms that can grow with you
- Avoid: Lightweight tools that can't handle growing product catalogs or multiple pricing rules
Good fit: BetterCommerce CPQ, Salesforce CPQ, Experlogix
Enterprise (100+ reps or multi-division quoting)
- Priorities: Deep integration, cross-functional collaboration, global scale
- Look for: CPQs that handle complex pricing engines, contract lifecycles, and multiple business units
- Avoid: Tools that require siloed or one-size-fits-all quoting logic
Good fit: BetterCommerce, Conga CPQ, SAP CPQ, PROS
SaaS & Subscription Sales
- Priorities: Recurring revenue logic, seat/usage pricing, contract amendments
- Look for: CPQs that support term-based pricing, renewals, and usage tiers
- Avoid: Tools built solely for hardware or static product catalogs
Good fit: DealHub, Salesforce CPQ, Zuora CPQ
Manufacturing & Engineering
- Priorities: BOMs, part compatibility rules, CAD integration, long sales cycles
- Look for: Strong configuration engines, visual configurators, ERP-ready backends
- Avoid: Tools that can't manage technical complexity or require heavy UI workarounds
Good fit: PROS, Tacton, Experlogix
Vendor fit isn’t about feature lists—it’s about operational alignment. Choosing a CPQ that mirrors your sales motion means less rework, less resistance, and more results.
CPQ Comparison: Top Vendors at a Glance
Here’s a side-by-side breakdown of top CPQ platforms—covering who they serve, pricing models, strengths, and common trade-offs.
Vendor | Best For | Pricing Model | Key Strength | Watchouts |
---|---|---|---|---|
BetterCommerce | Mid-market B2B commerce teams | Modular, pay-per-module | Unified quoting with built-in PIM, OMS, and order workflows | Less known vs legacy players—strong for teams seeking agility without vendor lock-in |
Salesforce CPQ | Salesforce-first sales orgs | Per-user/month | Seamless CRM integration, strong brand | High cost, limited flexibility outside SF stack |
DealHub | SaaS & services (SMB–mid market) | Custom quote | Fast setup, guided selling, digital workflows | Not ideal for physical products or engineering needs |
Conga CPQ | Large orgs with CLM needs | Enterprise license | CPQ + contract lifecycle management | Longer setup and user ramp-up curve |
PROS | Enterprise & manufacturers | Usage-based or custom | AI pricing, rules-driven configurability | High TCO, better suited for large ops teams |
Experlogix | Microsoft ERP users | Tiered subscription | Clean integration with Dynamics, NetSuite | UI less modern; favors IT-led implementations |
SAP CPQ | SAP ERP-based enterprises | Enterprise license | Deep ERP workflows & process alignment | Complex rollout, heavy to customize |
Final Word: The Right CPQ Isn’t Just About Features—It’s About Fit
Most CPQ evaluations go wrong in one of two ways: either teams chase flashy demos without considering real-world complexity, or they default to the biggest name in the market assuming it will “just work.” In both cases, the result is the same—a tool that looks great on paper but fails in practice.
The CPQ platform you choose will shape how your sales team configures deals, how finance enforces pricing, how fast legal gets sign-off, and how accurately customers receive quotes. It’s not a peripheral tool. It becomes core infrastructure for your revenue engine.
So your job during evaluation isn’t just to pick the most feature-rich tool. It’s to pick the one that fits your quoting logic, your approval workflows, your integration landscape, and your team’s speed of execution.
Because in CPQ, it’s not about “can it do it?”
It’s about “how fast, how accurately, and with how little friction can we scale this?”
Treat CPQ like a system-level investment. Align your stakeholders early. Prioritize real use-case demos over rehearsed walkthroughs. And above all, choose a platform that flexes to you—not one that forces you to adapt to it.